Fix a typo.

This commit is contained in:
jst 2013-07-08 20:55:20 +02:00
parent b272d51eaa
commit 098f882331

View File

@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ The provided interpolation functions are (from fast to slow execution time)
- `MitchellNetravali`: [Mitchell-Netravali interpolation](http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=378514) - `MitchellNetravali`: [Mitchell-Netravali interpolation](http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=378514)
- `Lanczos2Lut`: Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=2 using a look-up table for fast computation - `Lanczos2Lut`: Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=2 using a look-up table for fast computation
- `Lanczos2`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=2 - `Lanczos2`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=2
- `Lanczos3`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=3 using a look-up table for fast computation - `Lanczos3Lut`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=3 using a look-up table for fast computation
- `Lanczos3`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=3 - `Lanczos3`: [Lanczos resampling](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanczos_resampling) with a=3
Which of these methods gives the best results depends on your use case. Which of these methods gives the best results depends on your use case.